Julius Eastman
Crazy Nigger
A forgotten genius, enfant terrible, activist, or firebrand. That is just a selection from among the many characteristics that could be attributed to the American composer Julius Eastman. And besides that, he was also black and gay. Those two words, said out of context, come close to crossing the fine line of political correctness. At the same time, however, spoken simply and unflinchingly, they are the words that best capture the essence of Eastman’s being. Incidentally, he himself used those words proudly, even including them in the titles of his compositions.
However, thinking of Eastman as a frustrated and repressed black artist would not be entirely correct, in spite of the fact that his life’s story was in many ways more like that of a rock star than of a classical composer. He was born in 1940 into the same generation as the famous representatives of the American “minimalist school” of Steve Reich, Philip Glass, and Terry Riley. From his childhood, he sang in a boy’s church choir, and he received training in classical music at the prestigious Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia. Later he received a stipend at the University of Buffalo. He was also one of the first members of the S.E.M. Ensemble, which was founded by the Czech composer Petr Kotík and specialised in performing new music. The door was open to Julius Eastman as a performer, and in the 1970s he made a career as a successful pianist, vocalist, and dancer; among other things, he collaborated on projects led by Pierre Boulez and Zubin Mehta. In 1975, when the S.E.M. Ensemble performed John Cage’s aleatoric composition Songbooks, Eastman’s performance, which included nudity and hints of homoeroticism, caused a scandal and particularly outraged John Cage himself. In part as a consequence of these events, Eastman left Buffalo and settled in New York, where he continued to perform, playing in a jazz ensemble, among other things. He also performed his own compositions on various occasions, but that music tended to remain known only to his narrow circle of friends and supporters, and it did not succeed in attracting the lasting attention of a wider public. None of his works were ever published. Eastman began to manifest a sense of being misunderstood and unappreciated. This seems to have been caused in part by the conflicted feelings of a person who, while identifying with the repressed black community, was in reality living a life more like that of the privileged white majority. In the course of the 1980s, all of this led to dependence on alcohol and drugs, and as a consequence he lost all of his jobs and stable sources of income. Ultimately, he lost the roof over his head. When Eastman was evicted from his flat, several of his manuscripts were lost, and this made tracking down his estate much harder after his death. His attempts to return to normal life failed, and in May 1990 Eastman, homeless, died of cardiac arrest; his friends and colleagues did not learn about it until eight months later.
In an interview at the end of the 1970s, Eastman said he was trying “to be what I am to the fullest: Black to the fullest, a musician to the fullest, and a homosexual to the fullest”. It was during this period and in the spirit of his life’s philosophy that he composed his most controversial but also probably also greatest compositions, which came from the very depths of his soul. Eastman did not choose the shocking titles—Crazy Nigger, Dirty Nigger, Evil Nigger, Nigger Faggot, Gay Guerrilla—without due consideration. His goal was to highlight the themes of racism and homophobia. And is there any more reliable means to provoke discussion than controversy? Eastman succeeded. In January 1980, three of these works were performed at Northwestern University in Chicago. In the context of protests against racism taking place on the university campus, it was decided that the titles of the compositions would not be printed in the programme. At the beginning of the concert, Eastman gave an explanation for the titles. The recording of the concert was published in 2005. He viewed the word nigger as a kind of return to his roots. He made reference to the first blacks on American soil and pointed out their importance in building America’s economy. The word Nigger takes many forms, and above all it is in brief the embodiment of the black identity: “there are of course 99 names of Allah and there are 52 niggers. And so therefore we are playing two of these ‘Niggers.’” For America’s liberalising society at the end of the 1970s, all of that was still a bit much.
In recent years, the struggle for equal rights has been recast as a struggle for political correctness. In the late 1990s, Mary Jane Leach, an American composer who had worked with Eastman, began to look for the scores of his music. In 2005 her efforts culminated with the very first commercially published recording of Eastman’s music and with the making of his manuscripts available for the first time. Today, however, Julius Eastman is perhaps even more controversial than he was in his day. Mary Jane Leach discovered this for herself in 2019. During a lecture about Eastman’s works at the OBEY festival in Halifax, Canada, she used the entire titles of the compositions mentioned above. This resulted in complaints from representatives of the platform “We Are Missing”, which supports the LGBT community, blacks, and disadvantaged citizens. The whole incident led the presenter to cancel the concert, at which Leach was supposed to have performed her own compositions. All of this took place within just a few hours. It should be surprising to few people that these days many scholars, journalists, and social network administrators go the route of self-censorship and give these titles in the form of Crazy N****r or N****r F****t.
But is there really anything special about Julius Eastman other than the titles of his compositions, which still upset the public 30 years after his death? One of Eastman’s iconic groups of works is his Nigger Series from 1979 and 1980. Lasting nearly an hour, Crazy Nigger is the longest work in this series. As is the case this evening, it is usually played on four pianos, in part for practical reasons and because of the piano’s wealth of sonic possibilities. However, Eastman himself also allowed for the use of other forces. If the work is to be played on melodic instruments, he recommended using 10 to 18 instruments from the same family. Eastman’s musical language was based on minimalism, and his works were seen in their day as a sort of exotic, more emotionally charged offshoot of that style, which dominated American music in the 1970s. Now, however, the rediscovery of Eastman’s music and the distance of several decades have shed a very different light on his works. According to some musicologists, Eastman was ahead of his time and was writing post-minimalist music long before minimalism had reached its apex. The expression the composer himself used most often to characterise his style was “organic music”. The music’s fundamental compositional principle is a method whereby each new section of a composition contains material from the preceding section, while adding something and deleting something else. In this way, the composition gradually transforms, mainly vertically by the adding of more layers and elements of rhythm or colour instead of horizontally, as is the case for example with Reich’s famous phase shifting method. Eastman’s music is also often influenced by pop music, and improvisation is exceptionally important, as something for which he had an affinity as a jazz player. His scores are not explicit, so they just serve as guidelines for performers on how to play the piece in question. That is also why every performance of one of Eastman’s compositions is a unique original.